<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://blueworksbetter.com">
<channel>
 <title>Blue Works Better. - Taxes</title>
 <link>http://blueworksbetter.com/taxonomy/term/31/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>NY Times: Tax Cuts Offer Most for Very Rich, Study Says</title>
 <link>http://blueworksbetter.com/TaxCutsHelpTheRichMost</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;The study, by the nonpartisan &lt;a title=&quot;More articles about Congressional Budget Office, U.S.&quot; href=&quot;http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/congressional_budget_office/index.html?inline=nyt-org&quot;&gt;Congressional Budget Office&lt;/a&gt;, also shows that tax rates for middle-income earners edged up in 2004, the most recent year for which data was available, while rates for people at the very top continued to decline.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; Based on an exhaustive analysis of tax records and census data, the study reinforced the sense that while Mr. Bush&amp;rsquo;s tax cuts reduced rates for people at every income level, they offered the biggest benefits by far to people at the very top &amp;mdash; especially the top 1 percent of income earners.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://blueworksbetter.com/taxonomy/term/31">Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:51:04 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John F. Kennedy: Conservative?  Hardly.</title>
 <link>http://blueworksbetter.com/JFKGreatestTaxCutter</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When confronted with the evidence that &lt;a href=&quot;/EisenhowerFlamingLiberal&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;Eisenhower was a flaming Liberal (by today&#039;s standards)&lt;/a&gt; a few on the Right have responded by claiming that John F. Kennedy was a &lt;em&gt;Conservative &lt;/em&gt;- because he cut taxes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It has been said that JFK&#039;s tax cuts were the greatest in history; that may be true, but I haven&#039;t seen an actual analysis that supports or refutes it.&amp;nbsp; But let&#039;s put JFK&#039;s tax cuts into perspective:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;JFK cut the top tax bracket on earned income (wages) from 90% to 70%.&amp;nbsp; Today, Bush has cut this tax to half of that, or 35%.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;JFK&#039;s tax package treated capital gains (e.g., profit from stocks, bonds, and other investments) the same as earned income - 70% tax.&amp;nbsp; Bush has reduced capital gains taxes to 15%.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Most of the income of the wealthy comes from capital gains, not wages&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;All told the wealthy paid 70% of their income in taxes under JFK.&amp;nbsp; Today, the wealthy pay less than 20% (combining wages and capital gains).&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://blueworksbetter.com/taxonomy/term/33">Barking Heads</category>
 <category domain="http://blueworksbetter.com/taxonomy/term/31">Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:11:15 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
